|
Part A. Defining and Teaching Learning Outcomes
-
At what levels (course, program, institution, other) have
learning outcomes been identified and defined at your
college?
CCBC has identified and defined learning outcomes at the
course, program and institution level. Presently, the
general education core courses have ten to fifteen
well-developed, well-defined learning outcomes. These will
be posted on the college’s website. Common course outlines
have been developed for all other courses across the three
campuses. Each of the outlines has ten to fifteen or more
learning outcomes that have been identified as "the
minimum expected outcomes" which all faculty must include
in their course syllabus. The outlines are at various
stages of development and will be completed by the end of
FY2002. A sub-committee of the General Education Review
Board is working individually with faculty, program
coordinators and division directors to more clearly define
the learning outcomes and provide consistency across the
campuses.
-
In what ways are stakeholders at your college involved in
identifying and teaching learning outcomes, and which
stakeholders are involved?
We have broad-based
participation among the stakeholders involved in
identifying and teaching learning outcomes.
-
Students through course evaluations,
-
Faculty (primary drivers of the engine), also work in
college-wide discipline groups in addition to their
own course affinity groups within the division,
-
Department heads and academic deans base a portion of
faculty evaluation on this area and make sure that
it’s done well.
-
All program coordinators meet annually with their
advisory boards consisting of students, business and
industry leaders, and transfer institution
representatives to review and redefine learning
outcomes.
-
Tech prep connections to the public school system are
an important element in this arena.
-
Board of Trustees has an extremely high interest in
learning outcomes and provides policy oversight.
-
The office of the Vice Chancellor for Learning and
Student Development is the institutional "champion"
that provides continued impetus for this initiative.
-
One of the largest areas within the college,
Continuing Education and Economic Development
Division, has undertaken an extensive learning
outcomes assessment program. CEED produces in excess
of 6,000 FTE per year and reaches over 45,000 students.
-
In what ways do learning facilitators throughout the
college design learning activities that provide students
with opportunities to achieve these outcomes, and what
training do they receive?
Each year faculty, based on approved performance
objectives, are expected to enhance existing learning
activities and develop alternative instructional
strategies to facilitate student achievement of learning
outcomes. The college faculty utilizes a broad variety of
alternative teaching strategies such as distance learning
options, collaborative instruction, student research,
classroom research, learning communities and others. The
college encourages innovation in this area through summer
grants, Virtual Academy Training, the Teachers Learning
Computers Program, to name a few. In addition, the college
has a strong commitment to staff and professional
development and provides a wide array of activities both
internal and external to the institution.
In addition, the college has developed a number of
important strategies and groups to help infuse the concept
of outcomes based learning through out the institution.
These include but are not limited to:
-
The Council on Innovation and Student Learning
(CISL) (college-wide)
-
Three campus CISL organizations
-
Vanguard Action Teams
-
The Learning Outcomes Assessment Advisory Board
-
The General Education Review Board
-
The Developmental Education Steering Committee
-
What strategies (e.g., outcomes-based curriculum design
models, alignment of learning outcomes with
institutional mission and values, outcomes-based
professional development activities) have been used to
embed outcomes-based learning and teaching in the
culture of your college?
As a result of having begun a learning outcomes
assessment program nearly three years ago, the college
has effectively institutionalized the process. The
college’s strategic plan, LearningFIRST, has as its core
strategic direction, Student Learning—this is the
framework that connects planning at all levels and
drives the answers to the two key learning college
questions:
-
What does this student know?
-
What can this student do? And how do we know?
Outcomes assessment has permeated the institution in
many ways: program review procedures, faculty
evaluation performance measures, curriculum design,
Vanguard Action Teams, and extensive professional
development opportunities. Faculty must participate
in learning outcomes assessment projects in order to
be promoted to Associate or Full Professor.
Part B:
-
What plans or processes are under way at your college to
build or adopt assessment methods capable of
determining, with consistency across the institution,
the level at which each student achieves each relevant
course, program, and institutional learning outcome?
We have done this at a variety of levels. At the course
level we have conducted in excess of fifty learning
outcomes assessment projects over the past two years,
all of which included external validation procedures.
Faculty, under the direction of the learning outcomes
associate, developed these. Our current plans include
expanding the program to include five projects in FY2002
that will focus on high impact courses across the three
campuses. High impact courses are those which touch
large numbers of students: Psychology 101, Accounting
101, Reading 052, Mathematics 083, and English 052.
At the program level, all programs will be identifying
and defining program learning outcomes (goals) and
methods of assessment. All programs will be expected to
incorporate program learning outcomes assessment as part
of the program review process.
Finally, we are investigating and reviewing a variety of
assessment tools to assist us in our evaluation of
student attainment of institutional learning outcomes.
These include, standardized tests (Academic Profile),
and "GREAT" (General Education Assessment Team) Projects
at the moment.
-
What plans or processes are under way at your college
to expand methods of documenting student learning
beyond the traditional transcript (e.g., annotated
transcripts, electronic portfolios)?
We are
currently developing a pilot project for incorporating
electronic portfolios into our Banner system.
-
In what ways is your college addressing faculty, staff,
and student resistance to and fear of assessment and
documentation of student learning?
We have, from the beginning, determined that outcomes
assessment must be implemented in a risk-free
environment. All stakeholders must be confident that the
results of any particular outcomes assessment will not
be used in a negative or punitive way. We have
institutionalized learning outcomes assessment as a
learning improvement process at all levels in the
institution.
-
What strategies have been effectively used to promote
development of a culture of evidence at your college?
At CCBC students are expected to provide evidence to
faculty in terms of attainment of course and program
outcomes. Faculty and staff are expected to provide
evidence of attainment of learning based performance
objectives in the college’s evaluation process.
Program directors are expected to provide evidence of
program goal attainment in the Program Review Process.
The Chancellor and presidents are expected to provide
evidence of institutional goal attainment to the Board
of Trustees. Finally, CCBC has invested heavily in a
comprehensive Institutional Research Office to provide
research and data to support these activities, which
are a major component of our culture of evidence in
the Learning College.
|